Posted in Calls to Action, CBW 2013, CCCC 2013, Contingent Labor, Politics of Remediation, Resources

Petition for Human Readers (Anti-Machine Scoring)

Hi Folks,
This was already posted, but it got a lot of play at CCCC last week, so I wanted to repost it. This is a petition emphasizing the importance of human readers for student work, protesting a trend towards machine scoring.

Posted in CCCC 2012, Contingent Labor

Contingent Faculty Travel Fund Resolution

Hi Folks,

Seth Kahn, from the Labor Caucus of CCCC, has shared this important update on a Contingent Faculty Travel Fund. The details follow below:

The Labor Caucus, in conjunction with the Committee on Part-Time, Adjunct, or Contingent Labor, has put forward a resolution to be taken up as New Business at the Sat morning Business Meeting. In short, the resolution calls on CCCC to administer a Contingent Faculty Travel Fund, which would be supported by voluntary contributions from CCCC members (we’re asking CCCC simply to add a line to the membership form and conference registration form on which people can add extra $ that goes to the fund). I’m pasting in the link to the Google Doc that has the current text of the resolution; the language might undergo minor changes after I meet with the CCCC Resolutions Committee on Thursday afternoon, but this is the guts of it.

I’m expecting some resistance to this resolution. I’m asking for CBW’s support because BW faculty stand to benefit significantly from it.

Feel free to send/ask questions if you have them; I’ll be checking my mail at least semi-regularly Tues/Wed/Thurs of this week. Probably easiest to get me .

Posted in CBW 2011, Contingent Labor

Empowering Basic Writing Faculty: Contingent Labor

Jessica Schreyer from the University of Dubuque addressed the issue of contingent labor. Many basic writing programs rely extensively on contingent labor. How can we better reach out to our colleagues, empowering them to be a part of our writing programs? Schreyer established 4 issues that she felt needed to be addressed:

1. Meetings (when and how)

Schreyer polled the faculty to discuss the previous meeting structure. She used a doodle scheduling poll to find a common meeting time. She scheduled 2 meetings to reach out to everyone. She used a relationship-building model to create recognition and to provide input and expectations about curriculum, assessment, and textbooks. She worked to provide guidance and also to establish a clear community of respect, letting the adjuncts know that their work is very valued.

2. Connections on Campus (who, what, where & how to connect on campus)

While the University of Dubuque has a large number of resources for students, faculty do not always know what those resources are. So, Schreyer worked to help faculty make those connections.

3. Personalized Contact (making personal connections, valuing people)

She established contact via e-mails and frequent contacts. She also made appointments to visit the adjuncts when they were in their offices. She also invited them for coffee and lunch.

4. Professional Development (useful & focused)

In the past, meetings were scheduled for the convenience of the full time faculty, not the contingent faculty. She worked to find common meeting times for both full-time and part-time faculty to create a community between the full faculty. She also wanted the professional development to be more meaningful, so she worked to focus on topics relevant to first year writing. She also worked to use the adjuncts’ knowledge and experience to inform the professional development, having them lead the professional development sessions.